Brooks v. Lucas et al
Marlon Brooks |
Lee Lucas, Robert Cross, Richland County, Chuck Metcalf, Matt Mayer, Larry Faith, Thomas Verhiley, City of Cleveland, Unknown DEA Agents, Unknown Richland County Sheriff's Officers and Jamal Ansari |
1:2009cv01134 |
May 15, 2009 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Cleveland Office |
Richland |
Kenneth S. McHargh |
Kathleen M. O'Malley |
Both |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 144 Memorandum Opinion and Order granting defendants' motions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, summary judgment and to dismiss plaintiffs' Monell claims (Related Docs # 129 ; # 130 , # 132 ). For each of the foregoing reasons, the United States is entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Plaintiffs' FTCA claims, and Richland County and the City of Cleveland are entitled to judgment as a matter of law on Plaintiffs' Monell claims. Judge Donald C. Nugent (C,KA) |
Filing 98 Memorandum and Order. The Court hereby notifies the parties that it will convert Lucas' motion to dismiss (Related doc # 66 ) to one for summary judgment. Judge Kathleen M. O'Malley on 11/19/2010. (H,CM) |
Filing 30 Order of Severance. The Court SEVERS the individual Plaintiffs' actions from this action. Upon receipt of the individual complaints, the Clerk of Court to waive filing fee, assign to undersigned District Judge and copy all filings from original action to each of the new cases. Judge Kathleen M. O'Malley on 5/13/2009. (H,CM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.