Gudenas v. Cervenik et al
| Edmund Gudenas |
| Bill Cervenik, City of Euclid, John Doe No. 1, John Doe No. 2, Kevin Blakeley, Joseph Rodriguez, John Doe No. 3, John Doe No. 4, James Repicky, Joseph O'Donnell, Charlie Drazetic, Frank Pietravioa, John Doe No. 5 and John Doe No. 6 |
| 1:2009cv02169 |
| September 18, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| Christopher A. Boyko |
| Kenneth S. McHargh |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
Order Adopting Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge granging Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff Edmund Gudenas' Complaint is dismissed, re 43 Report and Recommendation. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 9/23/2011. (M,M)
|
|
Filing
55
Memorandum Opinion denying Motion to reopen discovery (Related Doc # 47 ). Magistrate Judge Kenneth S. McHargh on 8/9/2011.(B,IE)
|
|
Filing
18
Memorandum and Opinion. As outlined in this Order, the Court makes it explicit that the focus of discovery at this point should be on the qualified immunity issue. The Court also expects a fuller interaction between the parties before recourse is made to the Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth S. McHargh on 6/30/10. (R,N)
|
|
Filing
17
Order Adopting Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge granting in part and denying in part Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Motion to Dismiss is granted as to the right to privacy claim alleged under the First Amendment and granted a s to the failure to investigate claim alleged under the Fourteenth Amendment. The motion is denied on the Fourth Amendment claim, and denied as to qualified immunity in regard to that claim. The Motion to Convert is denied because the Court does no t rely on the exhibits and other materials beyond the pleadings to rule on the Motion to Dismiss, Related 16 Report and Recommendation, 13 Motion for to Convert Defendants Motion to a Motion for Summary Judgment, 7 Motion to dismiss case. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 03/16/10. (M,M)
|
|
Filing
16
Report and Recommendation that the motion to dismiss 7 be granted and denied in part, as discussed above and the motion to convert 13 be denied. Objections to R&R due by 3/8/2010. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth S. McHargh on 2/22/10. (R,N)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
