Office Depot, Inc. v. IMPACT OFFICE PRODUCTS, LLC et al
| Office Depot, Inc. |
| IMPACT OFFICE PRODUCTS, LLC, Patrick J. Lavelle and BRIAN KYLE |
| 1:2009cv02791 |
| December 1, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| Solomon Oliver |
| David S. Perelman |
| Plaintiff |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
82
Order Adopting Report and Recommendation (re 80 ) in part. Plaintiff's Motion 2 for Preliminary Injunction is granted and Defendant's Motion 80 for leave to File Their Supplemental Memorandum in Support of the ir Objections to the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate is denied. Plaintiff is required to file an supersedeas bond in the amount of $150,000 with the court in a form to be approved by the Clerk of the Court in order to compensate the Defendants should it later be determined that the preliminary injunction should not have been entered. This Order is in effect for a period of 6 months following the date Plaintiff posts bond. Signed by Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr on 10/12/2011. (D,M)
|
|
Filing
79
Order. Defendants' Motion to dismiss (Related Doc # 26 ) is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiff's Motion to dismiss Defendants' counterclaims (Related Doc # 30 ) is granted. Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr on 9/26/2011.(H,CM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
