Harris v. Smith et al
| Dwayne Harris |
| Keith Smith, Ernie Moore, Harry E. Hageman and Cynthia Mausser |
| 1:2010cv01313 |
| June 15, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Richland |
| Dan Aaron Polster |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
Memorandum and Order. As outlined in this Order, Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration is denied 46 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth S. McHargh on 7/14/11. (R,N)
|
|
Filing
44
Memorandum and Order. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 30 is granted and all of Plaintiff's claims are dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth S. McHargh on 6/10/11. (R,N)
|
|
Filing
22
Memorandum and Opinion Motion for leave to conduct discovery is denied as moot (Related Doc # 20 ); Motion to compel discovery is denied (Related Doc # 21 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth S. McHargh on 3/21/11.(R,N)
|
|
Filing
5
Memorandum Opinion and Order dismissing claims pertaining to lenght of sentence or incarceration. Plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claims against Moore, Hageman, and Mausser are dismissed. The court certifies, pursuant to 28:1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Case will proceed solely on Eighth Amendment claim against Warden Keith Smith concerning conditions of confinement.(C,KA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
