Progressive Casualty Insurance Company v. Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois et al
| Progressive Casualty Insurance Company |
| Safeco Insurance Company of Illinois, Safeco Insurance Company of America, Safeco Corporation, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Group Inc., The Ohio Casualty Insurance Company and Open Seas Solutions, Inc. |
| 1:2010cv01370 |
| June 18, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
113
Order: The analysis of the four-factor test set forth in § 18(b)(1) of the AIA counsels in favor of granting each defendants motion to stay. Accordingly, the motions to stay are granted. The consolidated cases are administratively closed pending notification of the completion of the CBM review 98 . Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 4/17/13. (BR,S)
|
|
Filing
49
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Defendants' Motion to Stay Litigation Pending Ex Parte Reexamination of the Patent-In-Suit by the United States PTO is GRANTED. This case will be closed, but reopened upon immediate notification of either party after the conclusion of the reexamination process. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 11/12/10. (LC,S) re 44 , 48 .
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
