Microsoft Corporation v. Lutian et al
Microsoft Corporation |
Dan Lutian, Robert Lutian, Burt Tardy and Discount Computer Parts |
1:2010cv01373 |
June 21, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Cleveland Office |
Cuyahoga |
Solomon Oliver |
Copyrights |
17 U.S.C. ยง 101 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 67 Order. Microsoft's Motion to Strike Purported Copyright Misuse and Antitrust Affirmative Defenses (Related doc # 20 ) is denied. Microsoft's Renewed Motion to Strike Defendants' Affirmative Defenses (Related doc # 56 ) is de nied. Microsoft's Motion to Strike Purported Copyright Misuse and Antitrust Affirmative Defenses of Defendant Computer Products Unlimited (Related doc # 60 ) is denied. Defendants must amend their affirmative defenses to comport with Twombly and Iqbal within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order or Defendants' affirmative defenses, as currently written, will be deemed stricken. Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr on 9/27/2011.(H,CM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.