Stalvey et al v. NVR, Inc. et al
| Chandler Stalvey and Linda Stalvey |
| NVR, Inc., John Does 1-10, Jane Does 1-10, Doe Corporations 1-10, Doe Governmental Agencies 1-10 and Doe Entities 1-10 |
| 1:2010cv01729 |
| August 6, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Medina |
| Solomon Oliver |
| All Other Real Property |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
Order granting in part and denying in part Plaintiffs' Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment (Related Doc # 24 ). The court modifies its prior Order foreclosing Plaintiffs' OCSPA claim and grants Plaintiffs leave to file their proposed Second Amended Complaint (ECF No. 25). In light of the court's ruling on Plaintiffs' Motions, the court extends the discovery period until 4/16/2012. Plaintiffs shall identify any experts and produce any expert reports regarding their negl igence claim by 2/15/2012. Defendant shall file any opposing expert reports by 3/15/2012. Dispositive Motions are due by 5/15/2012. In light of the amended pretrial deadlines, Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Discovery Period is dismissed as moot 33 . Signed by Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr on 1/9/2012. (D,M)
|
|
Filing
22
Order granting in part and denying in part Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint (Related Doc # 6 ). Signed by Judge Solomon Oliver, Jr on 8/9/2011. (D,M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
