PHN Motors, LLC et al v. Medina Township et al
| PHN Motors, LLC, Doralis Holdings, LLC and Scherba Industries, Inc. |
| Medina Township, Medina Township Board of Zoning Commissioners, Michael D. Todd, Sarah Gardner, Ray Jarrett, Therese George, Elaine Ridgley and Alliss Strogin |
| 1:2010cv02392 |
| October 20, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Medina |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
132
Memorandum Opinion and Order. The evidence received during the course of the trial supports the findings of the Advisory Jury and the Court hereby adopts those findings. Accordingly, the Court finds in favor of Defendants on Plaintiffs 9; claim that MTZR §603 is void for vagueness in violation of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment and on Plaintiffs' claim that Defendants' interpretation and application of the MTZR violates their rights under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Judge Donald C. Nugent(C,KA)
|
|
Filing
55
Memorandum Opinion and Order denying defendants' Motion for judgment on the pleadings (Related Doc # 27 ). Judge Donald C. Nugent(C,KA)
|
|
Filing
31
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting Motion to dismiss Michael D. Todd, Alliss Strogin, Sarah Gardner and Ray Jarrett (Related Doc # 13 ). Signed by Judge Donald C. Nugent on 1/14/11.(K,K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
