TCF Inventory Finance, Inc. v. Northshore Outdoor, Inc. et al
| TCF Inventory Finance, Inc. |
| Northshore Outdoor, Inc., Dawn M Allen and Kristopher S Allen |
| 1:2011cv00085 |
| January 13, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Ashtabula |
| Patricia A. Gaughan |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
Memorandum Opinion and Order: TCF's motion is granted in part and denied in part. TCF's motion in limine is granted to the extent it seeks to preclude defendants from introducing damage evidence of lost profits at trial because def endants did not adequately disclose to TCF in discovery a computation of their alleged lost profits. Defendants are not precluded, however, from introducing the following damage evidence at trial: evidence as to a lost loyalty bonus from Cub Cadet, evidence of a lost opportunity to sell defendants' business to Mr. Barnum for $100,000, and evidence as to the three lost customers orders discussed in the Allens' depositions. TCF's motion for sanctions pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(h) is denied. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 7/3/12. (LC,S) re 34
|
|
Filing
36
Memorandum Opinion and Order: In that TCF did not assert the theory it now advances or rely on the evidence it now cites in its original motion for summary judgment, TCF's motion for reconsideration is denied. TCF has not demonstrated a proper basis for reconsideration under Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 4/23/12. (LC,S) re 30
|
|
Filing
28
Memorandum Opinion and Order: TCF's motion for summary judgment is granted only on Northshore's first counterclaim that TCF repossessed Northshore's inventory without a contractual basis for doing so. TCF's motion for summary judgment is otherwise denied. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 2/10/12. (LC,S) re 24
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
