Bowling v. Holland et al
Daniel Bowling |
Vincent Holland and Lisa Austin |
1:2011cv00492 |
March 10, 2011 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Cleveland Office |
Cuyahoga |
Patricia A. Gaughan |
James R. Knepp |
General |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 Memorandum Opinion and Order: For the reasons stated herein as well as those stated by the Magistrate Judge, the Report and Recommendation is accepted, and respondents' Motion to Dismiss the petition is granted.The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. Further, for the reasons stated herein and in the Report and Recommendation, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c); Fed. R. App. P. 22(b). Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 10/19/11. (LC,S) re 37 . |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.