Richardson et al v. City of Cleveland et al
| Audrey Richardson and Carmencita Richardson |
| Shakir Ball, Cleveland Metropolitan School District, Stephen Williams, Michael McGrath and City of Cleveland |
| 1:2011cv00660 |
| April 1, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| Lesley Wells |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
Memorandum Opinion & Order granting in part and denying in part 30 Motion to quash filed by Cuyahoga County Division of Children and Family Services. Signed by Magistrate Judge Greg White on 4/23/2013. (S,S)
|
|
Filing
22
Memorandum Opinion and Order granting in part and denying in part defendants' Motion for judgment on the pleadings (Related Doc # 14 ). All claims against CMSD are hereby dismissed. All claims against Officer Ball, in his official capa city, are 'dismissed. The plaintiffs' First, Fifth, and Eighth Amendment claims against Officer Ball, in his individual capacity, are dismissed. The plaintiffs' Fourteenth Amendment excessive force claim against Officer Ball, in his individual capacity, is dismissed. The plaintiffs' Fourth Amendment excessive force claim and the plaintiffs' state law claims remain pending, against Officer Ball, in his individual capacity. Judge Lesley Wells(C,KA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
