Bugatti International, S.A. v. Hill et al
Luxury automaker Bugatti sues a Cleveland-based R&B and Hip-Hop artist Aurelius Hill a/k/a Aurelius Lillard who chose, and attempted to trademark the monikers 'Bugatti Butch' and 'Bugotti Buch'
| Bugatti International, S.A. |
| Aurelius Hill and Mean Mind Ent, LLC |
| 1:2011cv01065 |
| May 24, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| Lesley Wells |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 44 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 25, 2011. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued for service upon Aurelius Hill, Mean Mind Ent, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Magistrate Consent Form) (C,B) |
| Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Volkswagen AG for Bugatti International, S.A. filed by Bugatti International, S.A.. (Cioffi, Michael) |
| Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 350, Receipt number 0647-4724834. Filed by Bugatti International, S.A.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons Aurelius Hill a/k/a Aurelius Lillard, # 3 Summons Mean Mind Ent, LLC) (Cioffi, Michael) |
| Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge White. (C,B) |
| Judge Lesley Wells assigned to case. (C,B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
