Progressive Casualty Insurance Company v. Hartford Fire Insurance Company et al
| Progressive Casualty Insurance Company |
| Hartford Fire Insurance Company, Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest and Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company |
| 1:2012cv01070 |
| April 30, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
56
Order: The analysis of the four-factor test set forth in § 18(b)(1) of the AIA counsels in favor of granting each defendants motion to stay. Accordingly, the motions to stay are granted. The consolidated cases are administratively closed pending notification of the completion of the CBM review 48 . Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 4/17/13. (BR,S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
