Wilson v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Northern District Wilson v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution

Wilson v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution

Petitioner:	Eric R. Wilson
Respondent:	Warden Ross Correctional Institution
Case Number:	1:2012cv01554
Filed:	June 18, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Cleveland Office
County:	Cuyahoga
Presiding Judge:	Sara Lioi
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 30, 2013	Filing 15 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Petitioner's motion for additional time in which to file objections is denied, and his motion for the appointment of counsel is denied as moot. (Doc. No. 14.) Moreover, this Court has reviewed the thorough R &R, and finds no reason to disagree with the Magistrate Judge's findings and conclusions that the asserted grounds for relief be denied and the petition dismissed. Accordingly, the Court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's R&R (Doc. No. [1 3]), and the underlying petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. Judge Sara Lioi on 12/30/2013. (P,J)
June 18, 2012	Filing 6 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 2 Report and Recommendations. This action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. Signed by Senior Judge Peter C Economus on 6/18/12. (jr)[Transferred from ohsd on 6/18/2012.]

Date Filed

Document Text

December 30, 2013

Filing 15 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Petitioner's motion for additional time in which to file objections is denied, and his motion for the appointment of counsel is denied as moot. (Doc. No. 14.) Moreover, this Court has reviewed the thorough R &R, and finds no reason to disagree with the Magistrate Judge's findings and conclusions that the asserted grounds for relief be denied and the petition dismissed. Accordingly, the Court hereby adopts the Magistrate Judge's R&R (Doc. No. [1 3]), and the underlying petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied. Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealability. Judge Sara Lioi on 12/30/2013. (P,J)

June 18, 2012

Filing 6 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 2 Report and Recommendations. This action is TRANSFERRED to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio. Signed by Senior Judge Peter C Economus on 6/18/12. (jr)[Transferred from ohsd on 6/18/2012.]

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wilson v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Eric R. Wilson
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Warden Ross Correctional Institution
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?