Arocho et al v. Crystal Clear Building Company, Inc. et al
Louis Arocho, Aldurrant Arrington and Steven Hochstedler |
Crystal Clear Building Services, Inc., Stephen M. Lesko and James Lesko |
1:2012cv02186 |
August 27, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Cleveland Office |
Cuyahoga |
Christopher A. Boyko |
Fair Labor Standards Act |
15 U.S.C. ยง 2 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 66 Opinion and Order. Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment on Liability Issues (Related Doc # 56 ) is denied. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 3/31/2015.(H,CM) |
Filing 65 Opinion and Order. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment as to Named Plaintiffs Louis Arocho, Aldurant Arrington and Steven Hochstedler (Related doc # 54 ) is denied. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 3/26/2015. (H,CM) |
Filing 14 Order. Plaintiffs' Motion for Conditional Certification (Related Doc # 10 ) is granted. The Court conditionally certifies the collective action class as outlined herein. Within 15 calendar days of the date of this Order, Defendants sh all answer Plaintiffs' Opt-In Discovery, and shall provide the information outlined for all current and former employees of Defendants. Within 10 days of this Order, the parties shall submit proposed language for notice and consent forms to be issued by the Court. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 4/30/2013.(H,CM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.