Gooden v. City of Brunswick et al
Joshua Gooden |
Brian Mummert, City of Brunswick, Robert Casenhiser, Steve Hoover, James Keaveney, Carl DeForest and Charlene Gooden |
1:2012cv02918 |
November 26, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Cleveland Office |
Medina |
James S. Gwin |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 33 Order granting Plaintiff's Motion for Voluntary Dismissal without prejudice with respect to the remaining claims in this action. Each party shall bear their own costs (Related Doc # 31 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge Greg White on 6/23/2014.(R,Sh) |
Filing 28 Memorandum Opinion & Order granting Defendants Brian Mummert, Steve Hoover and Carl DeForest's 20 Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court grants summary judgment in favor of Defendants Hoover, Mummert, and DeForest in their individual capacities only with respect to Plaintiff's §1983 claims for false arrest/false imprisonment; malicious prosecution; equal protection; supervisory liability; due process, invasion of privacy; and residual rights; and, Plaintiff's sta te law claims for malicious prosecution; false arrest; false imprisonment; and, abuse of process. Plaintiff's official capacity claims against the moving Defendants; any claims asserted against the Defendant City of Brunswick; and, Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Charlene Gooden remain pending. Signed by Magistrate Judge Greg White on 4/8/2014. (S,S) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.