Sanford v. Ohio Department of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities et al
Latonya Sanford |
Ohio Department of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, Ohio Dept. Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities-Warrensville Developmental Center, Wendy DiGregorio, Randy Russell, Ginny Whisman, David Montgomery, Karen Reich, Ohio Civil Service Employees Association, Robert Robinson and Jane/John Doe |
1:2012cv02970 |
December 3, 2012 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Cleveland Office |
Cuyahoga |
Christopher A. Boyko |
Civil Rights: Other |
05 U.S.C. ยง 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 58 Judgment Entry that Pursuant to the Court's Memorandum Opinion filed August 17, 2015, the Court grants Defendants OCSEA and Robert Robinson's joint motion to dismiss. (Doc. No. 51 ). Plaintiff LaTonya Sanford's complaint is dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth S. McHargh on 8/17/15. (M,De) |
Filing 23 Opinion and Order. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Related doc # 15 ) is granted. All state-law claims and all Title VII claims against Defendants Ohio Department of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities, Ohio Department of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities - Warrensville Developmental Center, Wendy DiGregorio, Randy Russell, David Montgomery, Karen Reich and Ginny Whisman are dismissed. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 6/25/2013. (H,CM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.