K&M International, Inc. v. NDY Toy, LLC et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|October 5, 2015
Opinion and Order. The Court upholds the decision 132 of the Magistrate Judge to grant Plaintiff's Motion 63 to Re-Designate Inspection Photographs as "Confidential," as the ruling is not clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 10/5/2015. (H,CM)
|September 30, 2015
Opinion and Order. The Court Adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Related doc # 134 ). Defendants' Motion for Order Barring Plaintiff's Evidence on Damages (Related doc # 72 ) is denied. Plaintiff to fi le Second Amended Complaint within one week and Defendants will file Answers and Counterclaims within twenty-one days thereafter. The parties shall file a joint proposed schedule, complying with the paramaters set forth herein, by 10/30/2015. The Court will set a settlement conference and if no resolution is reached at that conference, the Court will entertain dispositive motions. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 9/30/2015. (H,CM)
|September 29, 2015
Opinion and Order. The Court Adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Related doc # 131 ). Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (Related doc # 59 ) is granted. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 9/29/2015. (H,CM)
|February 9, 2015
Memorandum Opinion & Order. For the reasons stated herein, K&M's Motion to Re-Designate Inspection Photographs as "Confidential" (Doc. No. 63) is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Greg White on 2/9/2015.(R,Sh)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?