Theodore Jackson v. Jason Bunting et al
Petitioner: Theodore Jackson
Respondent: Ohio Parole Board, Ohio Adult Parole Authority, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction and Jason Bunting
Case Number: 1:2013cv01326
Filed: June 14, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Cleveland Office
County: Cuyahoga
Presiding Judge: Patricia A. Gaughan
Presiding Judge: Nancy A. Vecchiarelli
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 60 Memorandum Opinion and Order: The Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED. Petitioner's Motion for Judicial Notice of Defect in the Record Page Count (Doc. 54 ) is GRANTED. Petition er's Motion for Evidentiary Hearing (Doc. 26 ), Motion for Leave to Amend and Amendment of Motion for Evidentiary Hearing (Doc. 28 ), Motion for Leave and to Supplement the Record (Doc. 29 ), Motion for Leave and for Discovery (Doc. 33 ), Mo tion for Court Order to Compel Respondents to Comply with this Court's Order to Produce (Doc. 48 ), Motion for Evidentiary Hearing, and or Discovery, Expansion, and Verification of the Record (Doc. 50 ), and Motion for Leave to Amend and Amend ment of 28:2254 (Doc. 58 ) are DENIED. Furthermore, for the reasons stated herein and in the Report and Recommendation, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and that there is no basis upon which to issue a certificate of appealablity. 28 U.S.C. 2253(c); Fed.R.App.P. 22(b). Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 9/10/14. (LC,S) re 39
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Theodore Jackson v. Jason Bunting et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ohio Parole Board
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ohio Adult Parole Authority
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Jason Bunting
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Theodore Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?