Buescher et al v. Baldwin Wallace University et al
Brittany Buescher, Emily Kopper, Rachel Lane, Estaban Rodriguez and Irene Kellett |
Baldwin Wallace University and Guy E. Farish |
1:2013cv02821 |
December 23, 2013 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Cleveland Office |
Cuyahoga |
Patricia A. Gaughan |
Americans with Disabilities - Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 Memorandum of Opinion and Order: This matter is before the Court upon defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on the Remaining Claims (Counts I, V, VI, VII, VIII, and X) in Plaintiffs' Complaint (Doc. 13 ) and defendants' Moti on to Strike Consent Agreement and Affidavits of Plaintiffs, Lydia Glaude, and June Romeo (Doc. 19 ). Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment on the Remaining Claims (Counts I, V, VI, VII, VIII, and X) in Plaintiffs' Complaint is granted and defendants' Motion to Strike Consent Agreement and Affidavits of Plaintiffs, Lydia Glaude, and June Romeo is granted in part and denied in part. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 2/6/15. (LC,S) |
Filing 9 Memorandum Opinion and Order: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Counts II, III, IV, V, IX, XI, XII, and XIII is granted except as to that portion of Count V alleging a violation of the ADA and Rehabilitation Act against defendant BWU. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 5/12/14. (LC,S) re 3 |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.