Curry v. City of Mansfield, Ohio et al
| Carline M. Curry |
| Angelo Klousiadis, Tim Theaker, City of Mansfield, Ohio, Dave Remy and Mark Morgan |
| 1:2014cv00177 |
| January 27, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Richland |
| Patricia A. Gaughan |
| Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Based on the foregoing, Ms. Curry's Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis is granted (Doc. No. 2) and the Complaint is dismissed based on res judicata and for failing to state a claim for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 2/11/14. (LC,S) re 3 , 1
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
