Sipershteyn v. Arzel Technology Inc. et al
| Vladimir Sipershteyn |
| Arzel Technology Inc. and Dennis D. Laughlin |
| 1:2014cv01206 |
| June 4, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| Benita Y. Pearson |
| Employment |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 621 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
60
Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons set forth herein, the Court grants Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 39 ) as to Plaintiff's age discrimination claim (Count 1), denies the motion as to the federal and state retaliation claims (Counts 2 and 3), and grants Defendant's Motion to Strike (ECF No. 54 ). The case will proceed to trial on Counts 2 and 3. Judge Benita Y. Pearson on 8/18/2015. (JLG)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
