Dobrski v. Ford Motor Company
Vincent A Dobrski |
Ford Motor Company |
1:2014cv02111 |
September 23, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Cleveland Office |
Cuyahoga |
James S Gwin |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 25 Judgment signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 4/24/15. The Court grants defendant's motion for judgment on the administrative record, denies plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and terminates this case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. (Related Doc. #24 ) (M,G) |
|
Copy of Opinion and Order and Judgment mailed to Vincent Dobrski, P.O. Box 670128, Northfield, OH 44067 on 4/24/15. (Related Docs. #24 , #25 ) (M,G) |
Filing 23 Responsive Brief to #18 Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record filed by Vincent Dobrski. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Fax from John Viscomi dated 4/25/07, #2 Exhibit B- Walton Hills Police Incident report, #3 Magistrate McHargh Order from 09CV963, #4 Exhibit D - Grievance Clause, #5 Exhibit E - UAW letters, grievance report, and inter-office memo, #6 Exhibit F - 2005 Earning Benefits Summary, #7 Exhibit G - Letter from Orthopedic Associates dated 4/16/07, #8 Exhibits H-J - Photos) (S,HR) Modified text and link on 2/6/2015 (S,He). |
Filing 22 Response to #19 Motion for summary judgment (judgment on the Administrative Record) filed by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Dobrski v King, #2 Exhibit B - Dobrski v UAW, #3 Exhibit C - Dobrski v Ford Motor Co., #4 Exhibit D - Dobrski v Kalinowski, #5 Exhibit E - Dobrski v Kalinowski (state court), #6 Exhibit F - Dobrski v Ford (voluntary dismissal))(Hoyt, Matthew) Modified text on 2/5/2015 (S,HR). |
|
Copy of NEF of non-document order granting motions for admission pro hac vice of Attorneys Schwartz and Scalia mailed to Vincent Dobrski, P.O. Box 670128, Northfield, OH 44067 on 1/28/15. (M,G) |
Filing 21 Motion for attorney Jason Schwartz to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number 0647-6928797, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Linville, Ronald) |
Filing 20 Motion for attorney Eugene Scalia to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number 0647-6923143, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Linville, Ronald) |
|
Filing 18 Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support Memorandum in Support of Judgment on the Administrative Record)(Hoyt, Matthew) Modified text on 1/23/2015 (S,HR). |
|
Copy of Order denying motion seeking discovery and sanctions mailed to Vincent Dobrski, P.O. Box 670128, Northfield, OH 44067 on 1/14/15. (Related Doc. #17 ) (M,G) |
Filing 16 Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's January 5, 2015 Filing Under Rules 37 and 46 filed by Ford Motor Company. Related document(s) #14 . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Note from Plaintiff, #2 Exhibit B - 12/23/14 Letter to Plaintiff, #3 Exhibit C - 12/31/14 Letter to Plaintiff) (Hoyt, Matthew) |
|
Copy of Marginal Entry Order mailed to Vincent Dobrski, P.O. Box 670128, Northfield, OH 44067 on 1/7/15. (Related Doc. #15 ) (M,G) |
Filing 14 Rule 37 failure to produce documents; Rule 46 objection to order that administrative record be filed under seal. Filed by Vincent Dobrski. Related document(s) #12 , #11 .(S,HR) |
Filing 13 Notice of Filing of Administrative Record Under Seal filed by Ford Motor Company. Related document(s) #12 .(Hoyt, Matthew) |
Filing 12 SEALED Administrative Record filed by Ford Motor Company. Related document(s) #11 . (Hoyt, Matthew) |
|
Copy of Case Management Conference Plan/Order mailed to Vincent Dobrski, P.O. Box 670128, Northfield, OH 44067 on 12/11/14. (Related Doc. #11 ) (M,G) |
Filing 10 Minutes of case management conference before Judge James S. Gwin on 12/10/14. (Court Reporter: none; Time: 19 min.) (M,G) |
Copy of Minutes from case management conference mailed to Vincent Dobrski, P.O. Box 670128, Northfield, OH 44067 on 12/10/14. (Related Doc. #10 ) (M,G) |
Filing 9 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting. Parties do not consent to this case being assigned to the magistrate judge, filed by all defendants. (Attachments: #1 Plaintiff's Proposed Report)(Hoyt, Matthew) |
|
Filing 7 Magistrate Consent Package issued 10/27/14 on behalf of Judge James S. Gwin. (M,G) |
Copy of Magistrate Consent Package and Case Management Conference Scheduling Order mailed to plaintiff at address on docket. (Related Docs. #7 , #8 ) (M,G) |
Filing 6 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Other Affiliate Ford Motor Company for Ford Motor Company filed by Ford Motor Company. (Hoyt, Matthew) |
|
Copy of NEF granting motion for pro hac vice admission of Attorney Thomas M. Johnson, Jr., mailed to Vincent Dobrski, P.O. Box 670128, Northfield, OH 44067 on 10/21/14. (M,G) |
Filing 5 Motion for attorney Thomas M. Johnson, Jr. to appear pro hac vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number 0647-6788296, filed by Defendant Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Hoyt, Matthew) Modified to add attorney's name on 10/21/2014 (G,CA). |
Filing 4 Answer to #1 Complaint filed by Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, Complaint, #2 Corporate Disclosure Statement) (Hoyt, Matthew). Modified on 10/23/2014, counsel notified to filed corporate disclosure statement using the correct event (H,SP). |
Filing 3 Return of Service by Clerk by certified mail executed upon Ford Motor Company on 9/29/2014, filed on behalf of Vincent Dobrski. Copy of NEF mailed to plaintiff on 10/3/14. Related document(s) #2 . (S,HR) |
Filing 2 Original Summons (issued to Plaintiff at counter) and Magistrate Consent Form (mailed to Plaintiff) issued for service upon Ford Motor Company. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (M,TL) |
Filing 1 Complaint against Ford Motor Company. Filing fee of $400.00 paid, receipt # 54660005226, filed by Vincent Dobrski. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (M,TL) |
Judge James S. Gwin assigned to case. (M,TL) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Kenneth S. McHargh. (M,TL) |
Service by Clerk. Summons and Complaint addressed to Ford Motor Company placed in U.S. Mail. Type of service: certified mail. Receipt # 7012 2210 0001 5746 2228. (M,TL) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Dobrski v. Ford Motor Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Vincent A Dobrski | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Ford Motor Company | |
Represented By: | Ronald G. Linville |
Represented By: | Thomas M. Johnson, Jr. |
Represented By: | Matthew W. Hoyt |
Represented By: | Jason C. Schwartz |
Represented By: | Eugene Scalia |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.