Bauch v. Richland County Children Services et al
Monty Bauch and O. B. |
Richland County Children Services, Jason Kline, Randy J. Parker, Patricia Harrelson, Edith A. Gilliland, Gina Brandy, Family Life Counseling & Psychiatric Services, Steven Burggraf and Debra Vanromer |
1:2014cv02765 |
December 17, 2014 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Cleveland Office |
Richland |
Christopher A. Boyko |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 255 Opinion and Order. Defendant Richland County Children Services' Motion to Amend or Alter Judgment (Related doc # 249 ) is granted in part. Plaintiffs' state law Negligent Training, Supervision and Retention claims are dismissed because RCCS is immune under § 2744, but Plaintiffs' state law Loss of Consortium claim remains pending for further adjudication. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 9/28/2018. (H,CM) |
Filing 248 Opinion and Order. Defendant Richland County Children Services' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Related doc # 238 ) is denied. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 9/10/2018. (H,CM) |
Filing 226 Opinion and Order. Defendants Richland County Children Services, Randy Parker, Patricia Harrelson, Edith Gilliland, Jason Kline, Tara Lautzenhiser and Holly Hartman's Motion for Summary Judgment (Related doc # 202 ) is granted in part and denied in part. Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (Related doc # 204 ) is denied. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 3/31/2017. (H,CM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.