Tenpenny v. Internal Revenue Service
Petitioner: Sherri Tenpenny
Respondent: Internal Revenue Service
Case Number: 1:2014mc00005
Filed: January 14, 2014
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Cleveland Office
Presiding Judge: Donald C. Nugent
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 26, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Memorandum of Opinion and Order For the reasons stated in the Order, the petition is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Court certifies that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Related document 1 . Signed by Judge Donald C. Nugent on 6/26/2014. (K,K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tenpenny v. Internal Revenue Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Internal Revenue Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Sherri Tenpenny
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?