Frisky-Watson v. Ford Motor Company - UAW, et al.
Frisky-Watson and Karen Frisky-Watson |
Ford Motor Company - UAW, Ford Motor Company-UAW and Ford Motor Company - UAW Retirement Plan |
1:2015cv00083 |
January 14, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Cleveland Office |
Lorain |
James S Gwin |
Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
28 U.S.C. § 1001 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 23, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 Judgment signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 7/23/15. The Court, having entered its opinion and order, grants defendant's motion for judgment on the administrative record, denies plaintiff's motion for judgment on the administrative record and terminates this case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. (Related Doc. #21 ) (M,G) |
|
Filing 20 Reply in support of #18 Motion in support of Judgment on the Administrative Record in favor of Defendants Ford Motor Company-UAW and Ford Motor Company-UAW Retirement Plan filed by All Defendants. (Johnson, Thomas) |
Filing 19 Reply in support of #17 Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record with documentation in support filed by Karen Frisky-Watson. (Cook, D.) |
Filing 18 Motion in support of Judgment on the Administrative Record in favor of Defendants Ford Motor Company-UAW and Ford Motor Company-UAW Retirement Plan filed by Ford Motor Company - UAW Retirement Plan, Ford Motor Company-UAW. (Attachments: #1 Brief in Support of Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record)(Johnson, Thomas) Modified text on 6/3/2015 (H,KR). |
Filing 17 Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record with documentation in support filed by Plaintiff Karen Frisky-Watson. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of Karen Frisky-Watson)(Cook, D.) Modified text on 6/3/2015 (H,KR). |
Filing 16 Administrative Record (not properly captioned) filed by All Defendants. Related document(s) #15 . (Attachments: #1 Volume(s) 1-Ford UAW Plan, #2 Volume(s) 2-Ford UAW Plan, #3 Volume(s) 3-Ford UAW Plan, #4 Volume(s) 4a-Ford UAW Plan, #5 Volume(s) 4b-Ford UAW Plan, #6 Volume(s) 5-Ford UAW Plan) (Johnson, Thomas) Modified text to add that the document is not properly captioned and does not have a cover page. Attorney Johnson has been notified to file all future documents as established in the local rules 5/5/2015 (H,KR). |
|
Filing 14 Minutes of case management conference before Judge James S. Gwin on 4/13/15. (Court Reporter: none; Time: 10 min.) (M,G) |
Filing 13 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting , parties do not consent to this case being assigned to the magistrate judge, filed by All Defendants. (Hoyt, Matthew) |
|
Filing 11 Magistrate Consent Package issued 2/20/15 on behalf of Judge James S. Gwin. (M,G) |
Filing 10 Acknowledgement of receipt of original state court record received from Lorain County Court of Common Pleas, Related document(s) #9 . (M,M) |
Filing 9 State court documents received from Lorain County Court of Common Pleas, case number 14cv185197. Original record returned to Summit County Court with acknowledgement of receipt enclosed. (Attachments: # 1 Letter to Summit County Court). Original record returned to Lorain County Court with acknowledgement of receipt, Related document(s) #1 . (M,M) Modified text on 2/13/2015 (P, S). |
|
Filing 8 Motion for attorney Thomas M. Johnson, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number 0647-6930039, filed by Ford Motor Company - UAW Retirement Plan, Ford Motor Company-UAW. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Linville, Ronald) |
Filing 7 Motion for attorney Jason Schwartz to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number 0647-6929990, filed by Ford Motor Company - UAW Retirement Plan, Ford Motor Company-UAW. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Linville, Ronald) |
Filing 6 Motion for attorney Eugene Scalia to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Filing fee $ 120, receipt number 0647-6929860, filed by Ford Motor Company - UAW Retirement Plan, Ford Motor Company-UAW. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Linville, Ronald) |
Filing 5 Answer to Complaint (Related Doc #1 ) filed by Ford Motor Company - UAW Retirement Plan, Ford Motor Company-UAW. (Hoyt, Matthew) |
Filing 4 Certificate of Filing filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Filing Notice of Removal)(Hoyt, Matthew) |
Filing 3 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Ford Motor Company for Ford Motor Company - UAW Retirement Plan and Ford Motor Company-UAW. Filed by Ford Motor Company - UAW Retirement Plan and Ford Motor Company-UAW. (S,HR) |
Filing 2 Magistrate Consent Form issued. (C,B) |
Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Lorain County Common Pleas Court, Case No. 14CV185197. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0647-6910563. Filed by Ford Motor Company - UAW Retirement Plan, Ford Motor Company-UAW. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - State Court Pleadings, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Corporate Disclosure Statement) (Hoyt, Matthew) Corporate Disclosure Statement filed as an attachment, instead of as a separate docket entry. NEF resent (C,B). Modified text and pulled CDS and filed as its own entry on 1/15/2015 (S,HR). |
Judge Lesley Wells assigned to case. Recused pursuant to General Order No. 2013-1. (C,B) |
Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Nancy A. Vecchiarelli. (C,B) |
Judge James S. Gwin assigned to case. Judge Lesley Wells terminated. (C,B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.