Asbestos Action - Refiled as Case No. 1:15cv10000
Alva M. Coykendall |
Honeywell International, Inc., Ford Motor Company, Pneumo Abex LLC and Genuine Parts Company |
1:2015cv00099 |
January 16, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Cleveland Office |
Cuyahoga |
P.I. : Asbestos |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2015. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Notice to take Deposition of Plaintiff Alva Coykendall by Videotape on January 30, 2015 at 11:00 a.m. filed by Alva M. Coykendall. (Cavanaugh, Ryan) |
Filing 3 Supplement Civil Cover Sheet to #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Pneumo Abex LLC. Related document(s) #1 . (Kottha, Arun) |
Filing 2 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Pneumo Abex LLC. (Kottha, Arun) |
Filing 1 Notice of Removal from Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas, case number CV-14-833814 with jury demand, Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0647-6913949.. Filed by Pneumo Abex LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Summons & Complaint, #2 Exhibit B - Notice of Party Dismissals, #3 Exhibit C - Summons, Complaint & Attorney Appearances #4 Exhibit D - Consent, #5 Exhibit E - Consent, #6 Exhibit F- Consent) (Kottha, Arun) Modified on 1/16/2015 to title exhibits (C,BA). |
IMPORTANT: This case has been closed. No further documents are to be filed in this case. All future filings should be filed in Case No. 1:15cv10000. (C,B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.