Ajamu et al v. City of Cleveland et al
| Kwame Ajamu and Wiley Bridgeman |
| City of Cleveland, Estate of former Cleveland Police Detective Eugene Terpay, Estate of former Cleveland Police Detective James T. Farmer, Estate of former Cleveland Police Detective John Staimpel, Estate of former Cleveland Police Sergeant Peter Comodeca, Frank Stoiker, James White, Detective Engelhart, Michael Cummings and Unknown Current or Former Employees of the City of Cleveland |
| 1:2015cv01320 |
| July 2, 2015 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| Christopher A. Boyko |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
96
Opinion and Order. Defendant City of Cleveland's Motion for Summary Judgment (Related doc # 65 ) is granted. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 8/4/2017. (H,CM)
|
|
Filing
51
Opinion and Order. Defendant City of Cleveland's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on Counts VII through XI of the Complaint (Related doc # 15 ) is granted. Plaintiffs shall file an amended complaint within fourteen days of this Orde r reflecting the dismissal of Counts VII through XI, as well as the voluntary dismissal of Defendants Michael Cummings and James White and the substitution of Karen Lamendola, Guardian ad Litem for Defendant Frank Stoiker. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 7/27/2016. (H,CM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
