Carter et al v. PJS of Parma, Inc. et al
| Carol Carter, Destiny Armelli, Mary Heuser, Carrie Hejduk, Judith Lauber, Dawn Melvin, Jeannette McDaniel, Melanie Moyers, Stephanie Sir Louis, Jennifer Welz and Jenny Zellers |
| PJS of Parma, Inc. and Lorraine Stancato |
| 1:2015cv01545 |
| August 5, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| Patricia A. Gaughan |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
45
Memorandum of Opinion and Order: Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification (Doc. 15 ) is DENIED. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 6/20/16. (LC,S)
|
|
Filing
43
Memorandum of Opinion and Order: This matter is before the Court upon Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings regarding plaintiffs' unjust enrichment claim relating to the post-January 2014 Banquet Servers (Doc. 21 ). In its April 4, 2016 Order addressing defendants' motion, the Court asked the parties to submit further briefing on this claim. For the reasons that follow, plaintiffs have stated a claim for unjust enrichment with respect to the post-January 2014 Banquet Servers. Thus, defendants' motion is DENIED in its entirety with respect to Count III. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 4/22/16. (LC,S)
|
|
Filing
38
Memorandum of Opinion and Order: Defendants' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 21 ) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Plaintiffs' claims for conversion and tortious interference are dismissed. Defendants' motion is denied insofar as it is directed at plaintiffs' claim for unjust enrichment on behalf of the 2012-2014 Banquet Servers. Finally, the Court will accept further briefing regarding the validity of 29 C.F.R. § 531.52 insofar as it pertains t o the unjust enrichment claim on behalf of the post-January 2014 Banquet Servers. Plaintiffs have ten days from the date of this Order to respond to defendants' arguments that 29 C.F.R. § 531.52 is invalid. Defendants will have seven days thereafter to file a reply. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 4/4/16. (LC,S)
|
|
Filing
24
Memorandum of Opinion and Order: Plaintiff's Motion for Conditional Certification, Expedited Opt-In Discovery, and Court Authorized Notice is GRANTED as set forth herein. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 12/17/15 (LC,S)re 11
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
