He et al v. Rom et al
| Rui He and Xiaoguang Zheng |
| Davor Rom, Investor Income Properties LLC, IIP Ohio, LLC, IIP Managment LLC, IIP Cleveland Regeneration LLC, IIP Cleveland Regeneration 2 LLC, Assets Unlimited LLC and IIP Akron LLC |
| 1:2015cv01869 |
| September 12, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| James S. Gwin |
| Other Contract |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
311
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 12/20/18. The Court, for the reasons set forth in this order, grants plaintiffs' motion for attorney's fees and costs. The Court orders defendants to pay $57,271.00 in attorney's fees and $911.76 in costs. (Related Doc. 307 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
287
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 5/30/17. The Court, for the reasons set forth in this order, grants plaintiffs' motion to register the Judgment, grants in part plaintiffs' motion for bond, and denies plaintiffs' motion for sanctions. The Court sets bond at $30,000.00 to account for attorneys' fees and costs. (Related Docs. 271 , 273 , 274 , 280 , and 283 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
265
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 3/21/17. The Court, for the reasons set forth in this order, denies defendant's motion for judgment as a matter of law; denies defendants' motion for a set-off; denies plaintiffs' ; motion for prejudgment interest; grants in part and denies in part plaintiffs' motion for attorney fees; and grants in part and denies in part plaintiffs' motion for costs. The Court orders defendants to pay $371,865.59 in attorneys' fees and $23,861.14 in costs, totaling $395,726.73. (Related Docs. 242 , 244 , 248 , 249 , 250 , 251 , 253 , 254 , 255 , 256 , 258 , 260 , 262 , 263 , and 264 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
187
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 10/13/16. The Court grants defendant Rom's motion for an extension of the discovery deadline and orders defendant Rom to depose plaintiffs He and Zheng by 10/25/16 as set forth in this ord er. The Court grants plaintiffs' motions to testify at trial by videoconference and grants plaintiffs' motion to permit witness Xianyao Wu to testify at trial by videoconference. The parties shall coordinate taking witness Wu's depos ition by 10/27/16 as set forth in this order. The Court further grants plaintiffs' motion to participate in the final pretrial conference scheduled for 10/25/16 by telephone. Counsel will be provided with the Court's teleconference information by email. (Related Docs. 159 , 161 , 162 , 163 , 164 , 167 , 168 , 175 , 179 , 180 , 181 , 182 , and 185 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
184
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 10/3/16. The Court, for the reasons set forth in this order, grants in part and denies in part plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment, denies defendants' motion for summary judgment, grants defendant companies IIP Cleveland Regeneration and IIP Cleveland Regeneration 2 motion for summary judgment, and grants plaintiffs' motion to compel. (Related Docs. 141 , 145 , 146 , 150 , 152 , 153 , 154 , 156 , 157 , 160 , 165 , and 166 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
155
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 7/25/16 granting plaintiffs' motion to exceed the page limitation and denying plaintiffs' motion for class certification for the reasons set forth in this order. (Related Docs. 138 and 139 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
149
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 7/7/16 denying plaintiffs' motion for leave to amend the complaint for the reasons set forth in this order. All deadlines currently set by the Case Management Plan and Trial Order remain in force. (Related Doc. 132 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
124
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 4/25/16. For the reasons set forth in this order, the Court denies the motion of defense counsel to withdraw until substitute counsel enters an appearance. (Related Doc. 122 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
106
Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 3/22/16 denying the motion of defendants IIP Ohio, LLC, IIP Akron, LLC, IIP Cleveland Regeneration, LLC, IIP Cleveland Regeneration 2, LLC, IIP Management, LLC, Investor Income Properties, LLC, and Assets Unlimited, LLC, for a protective order for the reasons given in the Court's order dated 3/10/16 resolving defendant Davor Rom's motion for protective order. (Related Doc. 83 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
97
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 3/10/16. The Court, for the reasons set forth in this order, grants the plaintiffs' motions to compel and denies the motion of defendant Davor Rom for a protective order. All defendants m ust produce documents and respond completely to the interrogatories and the requests for admission within 14 days of the date of this order. The Court will consider the imposition of Rule 37 sanctions should the defendants fail to comply with this order. Finally, the Court denies as moot both of the plaintiffs' substitute motions to compel as well as the motion to strike. (Related Docs. 70 , 71 , 76 , 87 , 88 , and 90 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
42
Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 12/22/15 denying the defendants' request for an emergency status conference. (Related Doc. 39 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
37
Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 12/11/15 denying the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction without prejudice for the reasons set forth in this order. (Related Doc. 13 ) (D,MA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
