Cleveland Police Patrolmen's Association et al v. City of Cleveland et al
| Cleveland Police Patrolmen's Association and Steve Loomis |
| City of Cleveland, Frank G Jackson and Michael McGrath |
| 1:2015cv01917 |
| September 17, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| James S. Gwin |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
19
Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 1/6/16. For the reasons set forth in this order, the Court denies the plaintiffs' notice of dismissal without prejudice and dismisses the plaintiffs' remaining Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) claims with prejudice. Further, the Court dismisses all other outstanding motions as moot. (Related Docs. 1 , 9 , 10 , and 18 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
13
Opinion and Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 12/2/15 dismissing the plaintiffs' pendent state law claims without prejudice for the reasons as set forth in this order. The Court retains jurisdiction over the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) claim and further orders the parties to file supplemental briefs within 14 days of the filing of this order that address whether either of the plaintiffs have standing to assert FLSA claims on behalf of individual recruits and whether said claims are ripe for judicial review. (D,MA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
