Stevens Engineers & Constructors, Inc. v. Iron Workers Local 17 Pension Fund et al
Stevens Engineers & Constructors, Inc. |
Iron Workers Local 17 Pension Fund and Iron Workers Local No. 17 Pension Fund Board of Trustees |
1:2015cv01965 |
September 23, 2015 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Cleveland Office |
Cuyahoga |
Donald C. Nugent |
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 |
29 U.S.C. ยง 1401 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 Memorandum Opinion and Order denying defendants' motion for approval of alternative supersedeas bond 33 . The alternative request for 30 day stay of judgment is granted. Defendants have 30 days in which to post a supersedeas bond in order to obtain a stay of execution of judgment pending appeal. Judge Donald C. Nugent 1/3/17 (C,KA) |
Filing 29 Memorandum Opinion granting plaintiff Stevens' request to enforce the Arbitrator's Award is granted and Defendants' request to vacate or modify the Arbitrator's Award is denied. Defendants shall refund Stevens' inter im withdrawal liability payments with interest from the date paid. Steven's Partial Motion 6 to Dismiss Count 2 of the Trustees' Complaint in Case No. 15 CV 1967 is denied as moot. The Trustees' Complaint 1 in Case No. 15 CV 1967 is dismissed. These actions are terminated. Judge Donald C. Nugent 8/24/16(C,KA) Modified text 8/25/2016 (C,KA). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.