Kacmarik v. Mitchell et al
| Michael Kacmarik |
| Stewart L. Mitchell, Jack Roe and John/Jane Does |
| 1:2015cv02062 |
| October 6, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Richland |
| Christopher A. Boyko |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
87
Opinion and Order granting in part and denying in part Defendants Stewart Mitchell, Wayne Gillam, Joseph Soltesz and Gary Meyers' Motion to Dismiss or for Summary Judgment (Related Doc # 71 ). Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 3/1/2018. (R,D)
|
|
Filing
48
Memorandum Opinion and Order denying 43 ODRC's Motion to quash; denying as moot 46 Plaintiff Kacmarik's Motion to compel. ODRC shall produce the subpoenaed documents to Plaintiff's counsel by 1/25/2017. ODRC may produce th e documents electronically or by U.S. mail. Defendants shall produce by 1/25/2017, a copy of the Receiving & Discharge Post Order that includes the previous redactions with exceptions to documents referenced in this Memorandum, Opinion and Order which shall be subject to the terms and conditions of the parties' Stipulated Protective Order. Magistrate Judge Jonathan D. Greenberg on 1/13/2017.(G,W)
|
|
Filing
26
Opinion and Order. Defendant Stewart Mitchells' Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Related Doc # 19 ) is denied. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 8/18/2016.(H,CM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
