United States of America v. Administrative Inspection of Lolita Rodriguez Agra, MD
| Administrative Inspection of Lolita Rodriguez Agra, MD |
| 1:2015mj02211 |
| December 31, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Inspection Warrant Returned Executed in case as to Administrative Inspection of Lolita Rodriguez Agra, MD (1). Served on Dr. Lolita Agra at 3361 East 55th Street, Cleveland, Ohio on 1/6/16. (M,De) |
| Filing 1 Application for Inspection Warrant with (Attachments: #1 Affidavit signed by Magistrate Judge Kenneth S. McHargh on 12/31/15). (M,De) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: United States of America v. Administrative Inspection of Lolita Rodriguez Agra, MD | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Administrative Inspection of Lolita Rodriguez Agra, MD | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
