Chapman et al v. Tristar Products, Inc.
| Kenneth Chapman, Jessica Vennel and Jason Jackson |
| Tristar Products, Inc. |
| 1:2016cv01114 |
| May 10, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Medina |
| James S. Gwin |
| Personal Injury- Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
176
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 8/3/19 denying plaintiffs' motion to require the Arizona Attorney General and the State of Arizona to post an appeal bond. (Related Doc. 171 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
162
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 9/4/18. The Court, for the reasons set forth in this order, denies movants' Arizona Attorney General's Office, State of Arizona motion to intervene and denies movants' request to be deemed formal objectors. (Related Doc. 154 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
120
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 7/9/17 denying plaintiffs' motion to exclude Eric Theiss from testifying at trial. (Related Doc. 117 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
112
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 7/6/17 granting plaintiffs' motion to compel Matthew Fisher's videoconference testimony. (Related Doc. 99 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
101
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 7/3/17 granting defendant's motion to strike plaintiff Chapman, Vennel, and Jackson's personal injury claims from this law suit without prejudice for the reasons set forth in this order. (Related Doc. 97 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
98
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 6/28/17. The Court, for the reasons set forth in this order, grants plaintiffs' motion to strike witnesses Kishore Mirchandani and Vanessa Haltrecht. (Related Docs. 82 and 85 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
86
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 6/20/17. The Court, for the reasons set forth in this order, denies defendant's motion to decertify the Class and bifurcates the 7/10/17 trial. (Related Docs. 78 , 79 , 83 , and 84 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
70
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 4/28/17 denying defendant's motion to exclude Dr. John Pratt's expert testimony for the reasons set forth in this order. (Related Docs. 49 , 56 , 61 , and 62 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
69
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 4/24/17 granting in part and denying in part plaintiffs' motion for class certification and certifying the classes as set forth in this order. IMPORTANT: Final pretrial conference reset to 7/3/17 at 12:00 p.m., Chambers 18A and jury trial is reassigned for 7/10/17 at 8:00 a.m., Courtroom 18A. (Related Docs. 43 , 45 , and 47 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
58
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 3/24/17. The Court denies plaintiffs' objection to defendant's expert Jason M. Mattice's report and cancels the 3/29/17 hearing for the reasons set forth in this order. (Related Docs. 54 and 55 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
44
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 1/18/17 denying defendant's motion to seal for the reasons set forth in this order. (Related Doc. 41 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
33
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 10/26/16 denying the parties' proposed protective order. (Related Doc. 25 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
32
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 10/25/16. The Court, for the reasons set forth in this order, grants in part and denies in part defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiffs' class action complaint. (Related Docs. 18 , 23 , and 29 ) (D,MA) Modified text 10/25/2016 (C,KA).
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
