Bell v. Young et al
||David Young, Kelly Norman Rose, Adrienne Husty, Jane Doe McCrae, John Doe Haynes, P. Dean, Tony Benson, A. Granson and Jose Rogue
||May 12, 2016
||US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
||Christopher A. Boyko
|Nature of Suit:
||Prisoner: Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
||42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|September 27, 2019
Opinion and Order Adopting Report and Recommendation (Doc. 45 ). The Court grants the Motion (Doc. 39 ) of Defendant David Young for Summary Judgment and dismisses the captioned case with prejudice. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 9/27/2019. (D, I)
|May 15, 2017
Order Adopting Report and Recommendation 16 denying 12 Motion for reconsideration and to amend complaint. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 5/15/2017. (R,D)
|September 19, 2016
Opinion and Order. Plaintiff's Motion to reopen case (Related doc # 6 ) is granted. Plaintiff's Motion for reconsideration (Related doc # 5 ) is denied as moot. Plaintiff's procedural due process, substantive due process an d Eighth Amendment claims are dismissed against all Defendants pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915A. His retaliation claims are dismissed against Defendants Husty, McCrae, Haynes, Dean, Roque, Benson, Rose and Granson. All claims pertaining to events occurring prior to 5/12/2014 are dismissed. The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. This action shall proceed solely on Plaintiff's retaliation claim against Defendant Young pertaining to Young's alleged conduct after 5/12/2014. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 9/19/2016. (H,CM)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?