Davis v. Cleveland Police Officers et al
Robert T. Davis |
Cleveland Police Officers, Kenneth F. Kirk, Philmore Evans, Chris Allen, Norfolk Southern Railroad Police Officers, James Kirk and Joseph Hergenroeder |
1:2016cv02174 |
August 29, 2016 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Cleveland Office |
Cuyahoga |
Donald C. Nugent |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 73 Order Adopting Report and Recommendation. The Report and Recommendation, issued on July 25, 2019 is hereby ADOPTED by the Court. Plaintiff's Motion to Stay Proceeding and Reconsideration of Counsel (ECF # 61 ), for Leave to Amend the Comp laint (ECF # 64 , 70 ), Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF # 65 ), Motions for Appointment of Counsel (ECF # 63 -1 ), and Motion for the Court to Rule on Initial Disclosures and Place All Motions Under Seal (ECF # 66 ) is DENIED. Defendants' Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings # 69 ) is DENIED AS MOOT. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF# 58 ) is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Judge Donald C. Nugent on 9/18/2019. (M,S) |
Filing 6 Memorandum Opinion and Order denying plaintiff's Motion for appointment of counsel (Related Doc # 3 ). This action is dismissed. The court certifies pursuant to 28:1915(a)(3) that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Judge Donald C. Nugent 12/13/16(C,KA) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.