Kraemer v. WhizCut America et al
| Rolf H. Kraemer |
| WhizCut America and WhizCut of Sweden AB |
| 1:2016cv02364 |
| September 23, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| James S. Gwin |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 3/9/18. The Court, for the reasons set forth in this order, grants defendant's motion to enforce the settlement agreement and its motion for attorneys' fees. Within 3 days of this or der, plaintiff is ordered to provide defendant with the bank account number associated with the account where he wishes settlement funds to be deposited. Within 14 days of this order, plaintiff is further ordered to execute the amended settlement ag reement provided by defendant as directed in this entry. Defendant is further ordered to execute that agreement within 14 days of this order and to file within 7 days documentation supporting its request for attorney's fees related to seeking enforcement of the settlement agreement from 1/15/18 to the present. (Related Docs. 59 and 61 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
49
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 5/16/17. The Court, for the reasons set forth in this order, grants the motion to dismiss the complaint as to defendant WhizCut Sweden for lack of personal jurisdiction. (Related Doc. 42 ) (D,MA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
