DeCrane v. Eckart et al
| Sean DeCrane |
| Edward Eckart, James Votypka, Christopher R. Chumita and City of Cleveland |
| 1:2016cv02647 |
| October 31, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| Christopher A. Boyko |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
183
Opinion and Order For the reasons contained herein, the Motion (ECF DKT # 177 ) of Defendants Edward Eckart, James Votypka and Christopher Chumita for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff's Intimidation Claim R.C. § 2921.03 and Plaintiff's corresponding R.C. § 2307.60(A)(1) Claim for Civil Remedy for Injury from Criminal Act is granted. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 9/29/21.(S,HR)
|
|
Filing
175
Opinion and Order: The Court finds no clear error and upon reconsideration, the Court adheres to its prior ruling. For the foregoing reasons, the Motion (ECF DKT # 161 ) of Plaintiff Sean DeCrane for Reconsideration of May 13, 2020 Order and Opinion is denied. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 12/23/2020.(D, I)
|
|
Filing
159
Opinion and Order: Defendants' Second Motion (ECF DKT # 139 ) for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part. Defendants' Motion regarding Plaintiff's First Claim of First and Fourteenth Amendment Retaliation un der 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is granted in favor of Defendants James Votypka, Christopher Chumita and the City of Cleveland, and is denied as to Defendant Edward Eckart. Defendant Eckart's Motion for Summary Judgment on Plaintiff's Second Cla im for False Light Invasion of Privacy is granted. The Motion of Defendants Eckart, Votypka and Chumita on Plaintiff's Third and Fourth Claims for Intimidation under Ohio law is denied. Within fourteen days of the issuance of this Opinion and Order, the parties shall confer and file a joint notice proposing three dates for a telephone status conference to discuss further scheduling. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 5/13/2020.(D, I)
|
|
Filing
131
Opinion and Order. The Court finds that disqualification of the Chandra Law Firm LLC is not warranted; the declaration of former Chief Patrick Kelly obtained by the Chandra Firm will not be suppressed and the Magistrate Judge's ruling (Related doc # 85 ) is upheld as it is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 7/17/2019. (H,CM)
|
|
Filing
108
Opinion and Order. The Court finds the Magistrate Judge's Order (Related doc # 84 ) denying disqualification of Defendants' counsel, the Zashin & Rich Law Firm and the City of Cleveland Department of Law, was not clearly erroneous nor contrary to law and is upheld. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 1/28/2019. (H,CM)
|
|
Filing
106
Opinion and Order. The Magistrate Judge's Discovery Order (Related doc # 87 ) is upheld. The Court finds that the Magistrate Judge's Order was not clearly erroneous nor contrary to law. The parties shall proceed as outlined herein. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 1/23/2019. (H,CM)
|
|
Filing
105
Opinion and Order. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint (Related doc # 49 ) is denied. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 7/10/2018. (H,CM)
|
|
Filing
48
Opinion and Order denying Plaintiff's Motion to Certify a Question of Ohio Law to the Ohio Supreme Court (Related Doc # 20 ). Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 2/21/2018.(R,D)
|
|
Filing
45
Opinion and Order. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (Related doc # 15 ) is granted. Plaintiff shall file his amended pleading by 3/1/2018. Defendants' Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings (Related doc # 13 ) is denied as moot. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 2/16/2018. (H,CM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
