Josef Maatuk v. Emerson Electric, Inc. et al
| Josef Maatuk |
| Therm-O-Disc and Does |
| 1:2016cv03023 |
| December 19, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Richland |
| Donald C. Nugent |
| Thomas M. Parker |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
94
Memorandum of Opinion and Order denying Plaintiff's 93 Application (Motion) for permission to file a reply of plaintiff to the reply memorandum of defendant's motion for summary judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 2/13/2019. (D,JJ)
|
|
Filing
90
Memorandum Opinion and Order: Defendant Therm-O-Disc's 87 Motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 2/4/2019. (D,JJ)
|
|
Filing
86
Order denying Plaintiff's 84 Motion for reconsideration. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 8/9/2018. (D,JJ)
|
|
Filing
81
Order denying Defendant's Motion to compel discovery (Related Doc # 75 ). A Telephone Status Conference has been set for 7/25/2018 at 02:00 PM in Chambers 11B before Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. Call-in instructions will be sent separately. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 7/10/2018. (D,JJ)
|
|
Filing
69
Order Adopting Report and Recommendation 66 in its entirety. Further, the Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith, and there is no basis upon which to issu e a certificate of appealability. Therefore, the Report and Recommendation 66 , is ADOPTED as follows: Defendant Therm-O-Disc's 47 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED as to Count One; Defendant Therm-O-Disc's 47 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Counts Two and Three; Defendant Therm-O-Disc's 48 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED. Judge Donald C. Nugent on 1/24/2018. (P,WL)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
