Thomas v. Slusher et al
| Shawn M. Thomas |
| Karen Slusher, Peter Burgos, Chris Adams, Robert Eslick, Kelly Rose, Leann Walker-Williams, Robert Yockey, Timothy Milligan, Aramark Correctional Services, LLC, Dennis Ginley, John/Jane Does and John Doe |
| 1:2017cv00794 |
| April 13, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Richland |
| James S. Gwin |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
64
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 6/26/18. The Court, for the reasons set forth in this order, grants defendants Walker-Williams and Yockey's motion for summary judgment and grants defendant Aramark's motion for summary judgment. The Court denies plaintiff's motion to strike. (Related Docs. 53 , 54 and 61 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
39
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 2/16/18. The Court, for the reasons set forth in this order grants in part and denies in part the State defendants' motion to dismiss. The Court dismisses all of plaintiff's claims e xcept his Eighth Amendment claims involving prison food; and his First Amendment retaliation claim as to defendant Walker-Williams. The Court denies plaintiff's motions to strike and denies plaintiff's motion for an extension of time as moot. (Related Docs. 9 , 10 , 20 , 34 , and 35 ) (D,MA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
