Simmons v. Wireless Exchange International 4, Inc. et al
| Alisha Simmons |
| Wireless Exchange International 4, Inc., Wireless Exchange International 1, Inc., Wireless Exchange International 2, Inc., Wireless Exchange International 5, Inc., Wireless Exchange International 6, Inc., Wireless Exchange International 7, Inc., Wireless Exchange International 8, Inc. and Omar Salti |
| 1:2017cv01573 |
| July 27, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| Donald C. Nugent |
| Fair Labor Standards Act |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
47
Memorandum Opinion and Order. For the reasons set forth, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF # 29 ) is granted as to Plaintiffs Alisha Simmons and Alphonso Durden and denied as to Plaintiff Alexandrea Young. Plaintiffs' comp laint sought a trial by jury. Accordingly, Ms. Young's FLSA claim, i.e., did she work more than 40 hours in any given work week, as well as all damages and whether Defendants can meet the showing required to avoid liquidated damages, shall be he ard by a jury on September 3, 2019 at 8:30 a.m. A trial order shall issue concurrently with this order. Given the near time frame for trial, the parties may submit agreed proposed jury instructions, as well as witness lists and exhibits to the Court on August 30, 2019. Judge Donald C. Nugent on 8/8/2019. (Related Doc # 29 ) (M,S)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
