Baker v. Bryant and Stratton College

Justia Dockets & Filings Sixth Circuit Ohio Northern District Baker v. Bryant and Stratton College

Baker v. Bryant and Stratton College

Plaintiff:	Christopher Sean Baker
Defendant:	Bryant and Stratton College
Case Number:	1:2017cv01705
Filed:	August 15, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Cleveland Office
County:	Cuyahoga
Presiding Judge:	James S. Gwin
Nature of Suit:	Americans with Disabilities - Other
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 12131
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 20, 2017	Filing 21 Memorandum of Opinion and Order. Defendant's 9 motion for judgment on the pleadings and request that this action be dismissed with prejudice is GRANTED. Defendant's request for an award of costs and attorney fees incurred in defend ing this action is DENIED. In light of this determination, the court further DENIES as MOOT, the parties' respective motions for summary judgment, ECF Docs. 18 , 19 . Finally, plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings, ECF Doc. 15 , is not actually a motion at all; instead, it is plaintiff's opposition memorandum to defendant's motion. In any event, the court DENIES plaintiff's mislabeled motion. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 12/20/2017. (O,K)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 20, 2017

Filing 21 Memorandum of Opinion and Order. Defendant's 9 motion for judgment on the pleadings and request that this action be dismissed with prejudice is GRANTED. Defendant's request for an award of costs and attorney fees incurred in defend ing this action is DENIED. In light of this determination, the court further DENIES as MOOT, the parties' respective motions for summary judgment, ECF Docs. 18 , 19 . Finally, plaintiff's motion for judgment on the pleadings, ECF Doc. 15 , is not actually a motion at all; instead, it is plaintiff's opposition memorandum to defendant's motion. In any event, the court DENIES plaintiff's mislabeled motion. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 12/20/2017. (O,K)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Baker v. Bryant and Stratton College
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Christopher Sean Baker
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Bryant and Stratton College
Represented By:	Michael B. Pascoe
Represented By:	Steven E. Seasly
Represented By:	Kara D. Williams
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?