Bartlett v. Cuyahoga County et al
| Adam Bartlett |
| Cuyahoga County, John Mirrotto, Brian Cartwright, MetroHealth System, Thomas Tallman, Leslie M. Koblentz, Albert Coreno, Michael Stricker, Marcus Harris, Corporal Bailey, Leslie Chute, Janet Hodgson, Kristina Cashin, Gwendolyn Bremer, Joe-Ann Cooper and John and Jane Does |
| 1:2017cv01796 |
| August 28, 2017 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| James S. Gwin |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 |
| Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 6/12/18 denying plaintiff's motions for relief from judgment and to enforce for the reasons set forth in this order. (Related Docs. 58 and 59 ) (D,MA)
|
Filing
56
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 5/22/18. The Court, for the reasons set forth in this order, grants both the MetroHealth Defendants' and Cuyahoga County Defendants' motions for summary judgment. (Related Docs. 47 , 49 , and 50 ) (D,MA)
|
Filing
39
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 1/4/18 denying plaintiff's motion for a protective order for the reasons set forth in this order. The Court orders plaintiff's deposition to occur either on 1/5/18, or any date within 10 days thereafter and mutually agreed upon by the parties. (Related Doc. 37 ) (D,MA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.