Stancik, Jr. v. Deutsche Bank et al
| Martin S. Stancik, Jr. |
| Deutsche Bank AG, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, Homeq Servicing Corporation, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC, Donald J. Trump and Wilbur Ross |
| 1:2017cv01809 |
| August 29, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| James S. Gwin |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
32
Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 10/1/18. The Court denies plaintiff's motion to alter or amend judgment under Rule 59(e) and denies plaintiff's motion to grant a new trial. Further, plaintiff is enjoined from filing additional post judgment motions, affidavits, or other documents in this case. The Clerk is directed to return, unfiled, any further documents submitted for filing in this action by plaintiff. (Related Doc. 28 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
25
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 2/26/18 denying plaintiff's motion for reconsideration for the reasons set forth in this order. (Related Doc. 21 ) (D,MA)
|
|
Filing
19
Opinion & Order signed by Judge James S. Gwin on 1/19/18. The Court, for the reasons set forth in this order, dismisses this action pursuant to Federal Civil Procedure Rules 12(b)(6) and 12(c). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. (Related Docs. 8 and 11 ) (D,MA)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
