Emiabata v. Progressive Insurance et al
| Philip Emiabata |
| Progressive Insurance and Pam Transportation |
| 1:2017cv01859 |
| September 5, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
| Cleveland Office |
| Cuyahoga |
| Solomon Oliver |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
Order denying Plaintiff's motion to reconsider. Related Doc # 41 . The court's order dismissing this case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is confirmed. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 9/20/2018. (D,JJ)
|
|
Filing
39
Memorandum of Opinion and Order. Because the court lacks subject matter jurisdiction, Progressive's motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) (ECF Doc. 29 ) is GRANTED. Because Emiabata's proposed amendments would be futile, the court GRANTS Progressive's motion to strike (ECF Doc. 32 ) and DENIES Emiabata's motion for leave. ECF Doc. 33 . Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 8/8/2018. (D,JJ)
|
|
Filing
28
Memorandum Opinion and Order. Because the court lacks personal jurisdiction over P.A.M. Transport, Inc., its motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2), ECF Doc. 14 , is GRANTED. Plaintiff's claim against Progressive Insurance will remain pending in this court, and the schedule set forth in Judge Solomon Oliver's minute order, ECF Doc. 19 , is CONFIRMED. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 2/21/2018. (O,K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
