Medina v. Bracy

Medina v. Bracy

Petitioner:	Alberto Medina
Respondent:	Charmaine Bracy
Case Number:	1:2017cv01884
Filed:	September 7, 2017
Court:	US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office:	Cleveland Office
County:	Cuyahoga
Presiding Judge:	John R. Adams
Presiding Judge:	William H. Baughman
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 11, 2021	Filing 41 Memorandum Opinion and Order: For the reasons set forth in this order, Medina's Objections (Doc. No. 40 ) are OVERRULED. The Magistrate Judge's Report & Recommendation (Doc. No. 37 ) is ADOPTED IN PART and MODIFIED as discussed in this order, and the Amended Petition (Doc. No. 18 ) is DENIED. Entered by Judge Pamela A. Barker on 3/11/2021. (L,Ja)
June 5, 2020	Filing 29 Memorandum Opinion and Order: For reasons set forth this order, this matter is recommitted to the Magistrate Judge for reconsideration to provide Petitioner the opportunity to file a traverse. Respondent shall file an answer/return of writ to the Amended Petition within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, and Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the filing of Respondents answer/return of writ to reply thereto by filing a traverse. Entered by Judge Pamela A. Barker on 6/5/2020. (L,Ja)

Date Filed

Document Text

March 11, 2021

Filing 41 Memorandum Opinion and Order: For the reasons set forth in this order, Medina's Objections (Doc. No. 40 ) are OVERRULED. The Magistrate Judge's Report & Recommendation (Doc. No. 37 ) is ADOPTED IN PART and MODIFIED as discussed in this order, and the Amended Petition (Doc. No. 18 ) is DENIED. Entered by Judge Pamela A. Barker on 3/11/2021. (L,Ja)

June 5, 2020

Filing 29 Memorandum Opinion and Order: For reasons set forth this order, this matter is recommitted to the Magistrate Judge for reconsideration to provide Petitioner the opportunity to file a traverse. Respondent shall file an answer/return of writ to the Amended Petition within thirty (30) days of the date of this order, and Petitioner shall have thirty (30) days from the filing of Respondents answer/return of writ to reply thereto by filing a traverse. Entered by Judge Pamela A. Barker on 6/5/2020. (L,Ja)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Medina v. Bracy
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Alberto Medina
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: Charmaine Bracy
Represented By:	William H. Lamb
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?