Hammock v. Rogers et al
Bruce A. Hammock |
Officer Rogers, Officer Dittrich, Officer Garner, Officer Kingsborough, Officer Rhinehart, Officer Soehnlen, Officer Williams, Officer Stantz, John/Jane Doe, Sgt. Doe and Nurse Doe |
1:2017cv01939 |
September 14, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Cleveland Office |
Richland |
Christopher A. Boyko |
Other Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 142 Opinion and Order Adopting in full the Report and Recommendation (ECF DKT # 139 ) and the Order and Supplement to Report and Recommendation (ECF DKT # 141 ). Plaintiff has no remaining claims in this case; so, the above-captioned Complaint is dismissed in its entirety. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 12/6/2019. (D, I) |
Filing 141 Order & Supplement to Report and Recommendation: Plaintiff Hammock's motion to dismiss as untimely the County defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF Doc. 140 ) is DENIED. Further, Hammock's motion for an extension of ti me to respond to the defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF Doc. 140 ) is DENIED. Finally, I continue in my recommendation that the County defendant's motion for summary judgment (ECF Doc. 115 ) be GRANTED. Objections to Report & Recommendation due by 11/29/2019. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 11/15/2019. (D,JJ) |
Filing 113 Opinion and Order. The Court accepts and adopts the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Related doc # 92 ). Defendant Advanced Correctional Healthcare's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Related doc # 51 ) is granted. Plaintiff's claims against Defendant Advanced Correctional Healthcare are dismissed. Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (Related doc # 67 ) is denied. Judge Christopher A. Boyko on 3/18/2019. (H,CM) |
Filing 111 Order: The Court (1) DENIES Plaintiff's motion for an order directing the warden to provide him with unlimited telephone, computer, and electronic filing access, (ECF Doc. 69 ); (2) GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiff's moti ons for the clerk to send him copies of the docket sheet and all documents filed in this case, (ECF Docs. 70 and 110 ); (3) DENIES Plaintiff's motion to take judicial notice, (ECF Doc. 70 ); (4) DENIES Plaintiff's motion to use the cour t's transmission facilities to make service under Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(b)(2)(E), (ECF Doc. 70 ); (5) DENIES Plaintiff's motions for leave to depose the Mansfield City Defendants and Richland County Defendants, (ECF Docs. 101 and 109 ); and (6) GRANTS the Richland County Defendants' motion to amend the order (ECF Doc. [107-1]) granting them leave to depose Plaintiff Hammock, (ECF Doc. 108 ). The Richland County Defendants have leave to depose Hammock on March 1, 2019. With this order, the Clerk is directed to send Hammock a copy of the docket sheet for this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 2/15/2019. (D,JJ) |
Filing 74 Order granting in part and denying in part Plaintiff's Motion (Request) for Service of Subpoena (Related Doc # 59 ). The Court GRANTS, in part, Hammock's motion for service, and directs the U.S. Marshals Service to serve Hammock 039;s subpoenas as construed. A copy of this order shall be attached to each subpoena, so the recipients are advised as to their construction. The Court DENIES, in part, Hammock's motion for service with regard to his subpoena directed to Mark Cockley, and relieves the U.S. Marshals Service of its duty to serve it. Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 10/1/2018. (Attachments: # 1 Subpoenas and USM forms). (D,JJ) |
Filing 52 Order . This court GRANTS the defendants' motion entitled motion to compel responses to requests for admissions and DENIES the defendants' motion for an order to deem requests admitted. The court, therefore, orders Hammock to respond to defendants' Requests for Admission Nos. 1-8 within twenty-eight (28) days of the date of this order. Related Document # 24 . Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker on 7/10/2018. (D,JJ) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.