Eaton Corporation v. Heinemann Electric Canada Limited et al
Plaintiff: Eaton Corporation
Defendant: Heinemann Electric Canada Limited and D.T. Shaw Company Ltd.
Case Number: 1:2017cv02443
Filed: November 21, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Office: Cleveland Office
County: Cuyahoga
Presiding Judge: Patricia A Gaughan
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 9, 2018 Filing 18 Marginal Order and Notice of Stipulated Voluntary Dismissal pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) is So Ordered. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 4/9/18. (LC,S) re #17
April 9, 2018 Opinion or Order Order [non-document]: Defendant D.T. Shaw Company Ltd's Motion to Dismiss Eaton Corporation's Complaint is MOOT. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 4/9/18. (Related Doc #10 ) (LC,S)
April 4, 2018 Filing 17 Stipulated Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Under FRCP 41(a)(1) filed by Eaton Corporation. (Castrodale, Joseph)
March 2, 2018 Minutes/Order [non-document]: Settlement Conference was held. The Court anticipates a dismissal entry by 4/5/18. All dates in the Case Management Conference Order and briefing on the Motion to Dismiss are stayed until that date. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 3/5/18. (LC,S) Time: 9 hrs.
February 7, 2018 Filing 16 Joint Motion for a temporary stay of proceedings until the March 2, 2018 Mediation filed by Plaintiff Eaton Corporation. (Castrodale, Joseph) Modified text on 2/7/2018 (S,SR).
February 7, 2018 Opinion or Order Order [non-document]: Joint Motion for a temporary stay of proceedings until the March 2, 2018 Mediation is Granted. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 2/7/18.(Related Doc #16 ) (LC,S)
January 29, 2018 Filing 15 Notice of Referral to Mediation. List of potential neutrals sent to parties. Agreed mediation ranking sheet due by 2/2/2018. ADR Hearing to be scheduled on or before 2/26/2018. ADR process to be completed by 3/2/2018. Related document(s) #14 . (Attachments: #1 Agreed Mediation Ranking Sheet, #2 Neutral List)(B,AL)
January 26, 2018 Filing 14 Case Management Order: Case Management Conference was held on 1/26/18. Case is assigned to the standard track. Case is now suitable for MEDIATION. Non-expert discovery shall be completed on or before 7/15/18. Expert reports shall be exchanged on or before 7/15/18 for party with burden of proof & 8/15/18 for Rebuttal and Expert Discovery shall be completed on or before 9/15/18. Pleadings shall be amended without leave of Court and new parties shall be joined on or before 5/15/18. Dispositive Motions shall be filed on or before 10/15/18. Settlement Conference is set for 3/2/18 at 9:30 a.m. Parties and lead counsel must appear in person unless otherwise ordered by the Court. Counsel shall confer within three business days of any scheduled conference to discuss outstanding issues and respective positions as to settlement. Counsel shall provide to the Court within two business days of the conference, a joint Status Report or confidential individual Status Reports describing the status of discovery, settlement positions, and issues to be addressed. The Status Report(s) need not be filed, but may be delivered via e-mail at Gaughan_Chambers@ohnd.uscourts.gov. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 1/26/18. (LC,S) Time: 30 mins.
January 23, 2018 Filing 13 Report of Parties' Planning Meeting Under Fed. R. Civ. 26(f) and L.R. 16.3(b), the parties do not consent to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge filed by Eaton Corporation. (Castrodale, Joseph) Modified on 1/23/2018 (S,SR).
January 19, 2018 Filing 12 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by D.T. Shaw Company Ltd.. (Schuler, Robert)
January 15, 2018 Filing 11 FILING ERROR, DUPLICATE OF DOCUMENT #9 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by D.T. Shaw Company Ltd. (Schuler, Robert) Modified on 1/18/2018 (S,SR).
January 15, 2018 Filing 10 Motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim with memorandum in support filed by Defendant D.T. Shaw Company Ltd.. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Master Manufacturing Agreement)(Schuler, Robert) Modified text on 1/18/2018 (S,SR).
January 15, 2018 Filing 9 Corporate Disclosure Statement filed by Heinemann Electric Canada Limited. (Schuler, Robert)
January 15, 2018 Filing 8 Answer , Counterclaim against Eaton Corporation filed by Heinemann Electric Canada Limited. Related document(s) #1 . (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Master Manufacturing Agreement) (Schuler, Robert)
January 3, 2018 Filing 7 Stipulation & Order: Defendants' Stipulation for Extension of Time to Move or Plead in Response to the Complaint up to and including January 15, 2018 is So Ordered. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 1/3/18. (LC,S) re #6
December 27, 2017 Filing 6 Proposed Stipulation for Extension of Time for Defendants to Move or Plead in Response to the Complaint filed by D.T. Shaw Company Ltd., Heinemann Electric Canada Limited. (Schuler, Robert)
December 7, 2017 Filing 5 Case Management Conference Scheduling Order with case management conference set on 1/26/2018 at 9:45 a.m. to be held telephonically by Hon. Patricia A. Gaughan. Signed Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 12/07/17. (D,Ma)
November 22, 2017 Filing 4 Corporate Disclosure Statement identifying Corporate Parent Eaton Corporation, plc for Eaton Corporation filed by Eaton Corporation. (Castrodale, Joseph)
November 22, 2017 Filing 3 Original Summons and Magistrate Consent Form issued to counsel for service upon D.T. Shaw Company Ltd., Heinemann Electric Canada Limited. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Consent Form) (S,SR)
November 22, 2017 Judge Patricia A. Gaughan assigned to case. (S,SR)
November 22, 2017 Random Assignment of Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 3.1. In the event of a referral, case will be assigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas M. Parker. (S,SR)
November 21, 2017 Filing 2 FILING ERROR, COUNSEL INSTRUCTED TO REFILE Motion for disclosure Statement filed by Plaintiff Eaton Corporation. (Castrodale, Joseph) Modified on 11/22/2017 (S,SR).
November 21, 2017 Filing 1 Complaint with jury demand against All Defendants. Filing fee paid $ 400, Receipt number 0647-8426992. Filed by Eaton Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons for Heinemann Electric Canada Limited, #3 Summons for D.T. Shaw Company Ltd.) (Castrodale, Joseph)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Eaton Corporation v. Heinemann Electric Canada Limited et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Heinemann Electric Canada Limited
Represented By: Christopher J. Weber
Represented By: Robert G. Schuler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D.T. Shaw Company Ltd.
Represented By: Christopher J. Weber
Represented By: Robert G. Schuler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Eaton Corporation
Represented By: Joseph A. Castrodale
Represented By: Gregory J. Phillips
Represented By: Michael J. Meyer, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?