Walker v. Miller et al
Robert Walker |
Tom Miller, Dean Lesak, Kenneth Baca, Gail Houk, John Doe, Jane Doe, Skip Sipos, David Colletti and Syed Ahmed |
1:2017cv02447 |
November 22, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio |
Cleveland Office |
Medina |
Patricia A. Gaughan |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 37 Memorandum of Opinion and Order: This matter is before the Court upon defendant Dale Thomae's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 34 ). The motion is UNOPPOSED and GRANTED. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 5/14/20. (LC,S) |
Filing 36 Memorandum of Opinion and Order: Defendant Dawes' Motion for Summary Judgment is Granted. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 3/19/20. (LC,S) re 30 |
Filing 16 Memorandum of Opinion and Order: The Motion to Dismiss John Doe 1 (Treating Physician) is denied. Plaintiff must amend his Complaint to identify the John Does within 90 days. He must then perfect service within 90 days thereafter. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 3/11/19. (LC,S) re 15 |
Filing 3 Memorandum of Opinion and Order: Plaintiff's Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. No. 2 ) is granted. This action is dismissed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915(e). The Court certifies, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith. Judge Patricia A. Gaughan on 2/6/18. (LC,S) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Ohio Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.